Fat Burner

Michael Klingberg
18 de Outubro de 2019 | Versão 4.4

Works pretty fine but fonts should be bigger on MARQ watches. Especially carbs and fat together looks looks much too small.

Grady
14 de Outubro de 2019 | Versão 4.4

Fantastic to review the type of burn from the activities you're doing to optimise your workout

Sabine
14 de Setembro de 2019 | Versão 4.4

Sehr interessant und funktioniert.

Youssef
19 de Agosto de 2019 | Versão 4.3.1

Can i know why fat burn come too mush when i swim in pull .i write more than 7000 fat burn

Jose García Pulido
7 de Julho de 2019 | Versão 4.3.1

I’ve downloaded it but the data field does not show any information, it is blank...

Michael Klingberg
13 de Maio de 2019 | Versão 4.3.1

Pretty good on MARQ Expedition - thank you !!

Shnyaps
4 de Maio de 2019 | Versão 4.3.1

Very good data field. But there is an issue: there is random values after pause an activity and resume later then. Random fat burn value, random carb burn value every pause, resume later, resume(((

🇳🇱Jan Witter🇳🇱
18 de Abril de 2019 | Versão 4.3

Is there anywhere a place where I can see how I can interpretate the figures.

LupusPluvia🐺
10 de Março de 2019 | Versão 4.2.2

Ich finde die APK gut aber was nervig ist ist die Benachrichtigung und Vibration Bitte ausschalten

Kuba G.
26 de Fevereiro de 2019 | Versão 4.2.2

Once I put this analysis to my activities, I was not able to use Garmin IQ watch faces durimg aktivity anymore. Fenix 5

Leonardo
25 de Janeiro de 2019 | Versão 4.2.1

Amazing app. I love it. Just one question... Is it possible to get the carbs and fat dates at the same time on the Edge device? I have fat data but I don't achieve the carbs data. Only at the end of the activity.. Thanks for your job!!!!

Patrik Král
6 de Novembro de 2018 | Versão 4.1-upd5

Each time I swim the app says several thousand grams of fat burned. Last swimming was 7347.95 g of fat and 4.89 grams of Carbs burned - nonsense. (57 minutes of swimming total, 2800 m, 508 kcal)

Rob van den Boomgaard
25 de Setembro de 2018 | Versão 4.1-upd5

Works very motivating.

Andrea Marini
5 de Setembro de 2018 | Versão 4.1-upd5

Good datafield, I ask if possible to have a big size text when both carb and fat are selected on Fenix 5. Too small. Thank you.

Tisztul_A_Visztula
12 de Junho de 2018 | Versão 4.1-upd5

I still love it.

Yulius
18 de Maio de 2018 | Versão 4.1-upd2

Great Idea! But a little inaccurate, I think. When I walk almost 100% of the calories burned are attributed to fat. May I suggest that you use the information provided on this website to make the fat burn a little more accurate? http://www.exercisemed.org/research-blog/exercise-intensity-for.html

Oliver Trstan
14 de Maio de 2018 | Versão 4.1-upd2

pocita to podla algoritmu ktory nedava ziadny zmysel.. neberie do uvahy rychlost ,stupanie atd

Giorgos Chrysakis
13 de Maio de 2018 | Versão 4.1-upd2

Great work! Thanks for your effort. I have a small suggestion. Wouldn't it be more meaningful if the graphs display fat/carbs burned per hour instead?

mCan
1 de Maio de 2018 | Versão 4.1-upd2

perfect app

Marco GR
15 de Março de 2018 | Versão 4.1-upd1

As I have been able to verify, the application has a fault, every time you put on pause and resume the exercise, the burned fat increases considerably, therefore, the data of burned fat is erroneous. I checked it by doing indoor bike, in 14 minutes of exercise stopping and resuming the clock, I burned 10.05g of fat and 7.38g of carbs and 120 Kcal, and the same day but later, in 43 minutes of continuous exercise I burned 9 , 60g of fat and 129.90g of carbs and 606 Kcal. Therefore the data of burned fat is not correct, and I repeat, I have detected the fault when during an activity, you stop the timer and continue several times. I hope it can be solved because it is a good application. Greetings.Sorry for the translation

Michael Klingberg
24 de Janeiro de 2018 | Versão 4.1

Theoretical a nice data field but still a bad bug: In case you choose 'fat and carbs' and record (!) both ... than pause the exercise and follow it up it up later ... this fit file gets corrupt and prevents synchronisation with Garmin Express. The only way to get it working again is deleting that fit file from the watch and (!) from the computer ! Strange thing as it does not happen when 'fat and carbs' are not recorded.

Migue
13 de Janeiro de 2018 | Versão 3.1

Buena aplicación para saber la grasa y carbohidratos que se gasta en cada entrenamiento, es configurable. Muy buena aplicacion!!!

Santi Ridefast.ch
20 de Dezembro de 2017 | Versão 3.0

very nice

Tisztul_A_Visztula
3 de Dezembro de 2017 | Versão 2.7-upd

It's really great to see that you can give us back us in some way what Garmin has withdrawn, namely the fat calorie calculation which they introduced already for 310XT and 910XT. I wrote a longer message with 'contact developer', but let me highlight here too, that the predefined percentages of the widgetis are too high for people except for pro athletes. I guess before you assigned the percentages to the HR zones the latter were considered as zones applying the modified Karvonen approach, so breaking down the HRR into 5 zones like 50-60%, .... and 90-100%. Since I participated in respirometry test in real labs where even a cardiologist supervised the whole procedure I must say that my Respiratory Exchange Ratio at different HRs implies that already in the upper part of Z0 the share of fat is less than 80%. So for the whole Z0 and especially for Z1, 100% is an overly optimistic estimation. And similarly 80% for Z2 is almost double of my numbers. Certainly I could tweak my HR zones to get a better fat cal estimation, but I fear that some other numbers will be accidently tweaked and ruined like training effect. Anyway my main message should not be this one, but the happiness seeing that somebody started to deal with fat calories burnt as a data filed of Garmin gadgets, Zoltan

wildsau2
23 de Novembro de 2017 | Versão 2.7-upd

my Favorit IQ DataField on FR3 and Edge820. Thank you very much, Peter. Is it possible to make a simple linear (or expo) function to calculate the fat grams (100% = HFrest, 0%=HFmax) instead of clustering to HF zones, perhaps it will be more precise? Don't misunderstand, it's a good tool already.